I'm feeling quite weird because they're making it in the future.

Kelvinz10 said: I'm feeling quite weird because they're making it in the future.

It was inevitable, you can't keep fighting in WW2 and Vietnam forever. I think they have a bunch of goals they set out to do and hopefully they fulfill their expectations. It will end up being another CoD game whether that is good or bad depends on who is making the critique.

The series already died at MW2, the first MW was the best of all.

Reminds me of BF2142. I don't like CoD except their campaign is pretty fun. It barely looks any different from the other games, only a theme change. I find the multiplayer really repetitive and boring.

I'll never buy CoD again. Yeah.

lozz21 said: Reminds me of BF2142. I don't like CoD except their campaign is pretty fun. It barely looks any different from the other games, only a theme change. I find the multiplayer really repetitive and boring.

Agree

hmmm i think the medal of honor will win the new one.. because i already saw the trailer of black ops 2 suck!... what are they doing in cod? it should be in present time not future!

the graphics still look like crap and there ripping off a bunch of old games that look the same way.

i think its gonna sell well, but be sht since their hardly giving themselves enough time to make it anything special. Just another yearly pumpout of a generic fps

Some new ideas, especially with the mission select ideas, but I just havent seemed to like treyarch's take on the series.

The concept of CoD games really has it aim at the "younger" generation. I think its a smart move by Treyarch. Every company really tries its best to squeeze every single drip of juice out of call of duty frenchize.
I doubt BO2 it will have alot of changes to it since the capability of consoles like PS3 and XBOX360 are limited these days, we probably wont be seeing alot of different things.

Xolutiionz said: The concept of CoD games really has it aim at the "younger" generation. I think its a smart move by Treyarch. Every company really tries its best to squeeze every single drip of juice out of call of duty frenchize.
I doubt BO2 it will have alot of changes to it since the capability of consoles like PS3 and XBOX360 are limited these days, we probably wont be seeing alot of different things.

lol do you even play COD?? it's aimed not just kids but also the hacking community and those who don't play fair. Half the reason this and next generation of kids are becoming little deviants are not only beecuase of crappy parents but the kids that play this and many other M rated games they shouldn't.

And sense MW1 the game has had no change what so ever and yet without even trying they make millions and are one of the biggest greedy companies today. And people call EA bad and yet they don't even look at the destruction call of duty has done to the gaming world and the market.

I'm going to skip this one since the first Black ops wasn't that great

kinglonewolf said: And people call EA bad and yet they don't even look at the destruction call of duty has done to the gaming world and the market.

What about what EA has done to the gaming world? Buying small developers just to get the rights to their IPs and then milking the franchise only to dismantle the developer after they have milked it dry. How about how EA punishes consumers who want to buy second hand games? I don't see Call of Duty forcing people to buy an online pass to play their games. You know what games do force you to buy an online pass ... Battlefield 3, FIFA 12, Madden, NCAA Football. How about forcing people to buy their game by licensing the sport so there is no competition. 2k sports was killing EA and then EA was able to get a deal with the NFL for exclusive right which meant it cut 2k out of official football games. Is that not harmful to the gaming industry? Doesn't that destroy the market? How is this helping the gaming world at all. CoD and Activision are not perfect in the least and I will never say they are. Can't both companies be greedy? You know it helps if you write examples to prove a point.

Addice said:

kinglonewolf said: And people call EA bad and yet they don't even look at the destruction call of duty has done to the gaming world and the market.

What about what EA has done to the gaming world? Buying small developers just to get the rights to their IPs and then milking the franchise only to dismantle the developer after they have milked it dry. How about how EA punishes consumers who want to buy second hand games? I don't see Call of Duty forcing people to buy an online pass to play their games. You know what games do force you to buy an online pass ... Battlefield 3, FIFA 12, Madden, NCAA Football. How about forcing people to buy their game by licensing the sport so there is no competition. 2k sports was killing EA and then EA was able to get a deal with the NFL for exclusive right which meant it cut 2k out of official football games. Is that not harmful to the gaming industry? Doesn't that destroy the market? How is this helping the gaming world at all. CoD and Activision are not perfect in the least and I will never say they are. Can't both companies be greedy? You know it helps if you write examples to prove a point.

examples ok...

do you know the point of those online passes?? The point is to stop the hacking comunity and to keep there games safe from those with ilegal copies.

While activision and COD are embracing the hacking community with open arms and letting them destroy what could of been a good game.

EA is a publisher they are suppose to buyout/merge with other companies to help them develope and support them for as long as they can.

EA is trying to fight the used game market to help improve the money that goes to developers rather then all the money going into the destributors like gamestop.

Activision stands by and release the same game every year, rips people off, And on top of that stealing past game designs with the new Black ops 2. At this point there not even original anymore.

2 more things

#1. Never take my comments too serious...
#2. I work within the gaming idustry along side many companies. My comments might be harsh at times but I also see a different world then what everyone on the outside see's. You go off the media to get your facts, but it's the media that can twist stories and hurt what going on in gaming before developers/publishers get the chance to talk and explain.