Borderlands 3! Another high profile exclusive for the Epic Games Store!

The Borderlands 3 was just announced as another Epic Games store exclusive title (for it's first 6 months) and naturally the flame and runt against EGS was re-heated!

Yes, there are still a lot to hate on the new competitor store (and launcher even), but exclusivity shouldn't be one of them!

 

Some important features are missing indeed. Reviews or achievements for example do make a big difference for some players. That said, most people seem to forget that Steam's store has been around for over a decade while EGS hasn't reached half a year, yet it's already made a huge impact on the scene, even with the absence of some features.

Add to that the fact that, while still very early to believe that it will stay this way, the games on the Epic store get heaps more exposure than they would ever on Steam and you'll realize that even the reviews feature, is not as important... yet!

 

As for the Steam file shenanigans, if you give Epic a small benefit of the doubt and don't just roll with the hate wave, you will end up reading that the Steam file "scandal" was that, a scandal.

Sure, they cut some important corners. Yes, they shouldn't have. But if you dive a little deeper and make a more informative search, you will see that what was read from it, was actually what Epic said was read.

 

On to the actual point I wanted to make here.

We all love to hate exclusivity, because we've felt cheated by it at some point when we were eager for a new release, only to figure out it's only available on a console. The problem with those was that the price was immediately increased in multitude if you didn't already own the according one.

The PC stores war however, poses no such difficulty for the players in the least. Chances are, even if you are a Steam fanboy, you already had at least one more launcher on your PC, be it the Battle.net, Origin, Uplay or even Bethesda's one (and I'm most likely forgetting some important mentions).

 

In conclusion, I believe that the biggest problem everyone has against Epic Games, is their immense success and has nothing to do with actual reasoning. There are still a ton of things Epic can and needs to improve, but exclusivity hurts absolutely no one, other than it's direct competition!

Replies • 80

theflawlessone said:

DAMN.

Another one bites the dust.

Not sure what to make of this. Do you agree, at least in the general sense, or not?



Planetary

"Exclusivity hurts no one"
Sure if the platform is not from some shady company who won't sell customer credit card and personal information 

edited



Planetary

hmm strange reason to legitimate a new launcher.... "you probably have others already, why not add another.."

back to topic:

In my opinion you can not compare a console exclusive to a store exclusive... the grade of taylored development is on a whole different level when you compare PS, XBOX and PC games... for consoles you have a highly optimized piece of software whereas for PC you need to have a widely supported software... For store exclusives you have the exact same piece of software that is just outfitted with a different DRM...

Of course a developer/publisher is free to decide where to sell the software, but I think by doing exclusives you only harm yourself... people that hate/don't want a specific launcher (or simply to have everything in one place) will either wait it out and pay less money as soon as it's launched on the specific launcher they want (since i'ts an "old" game) or simply pirate it, play it and don't pay anything at all...

If you want to argue with more competition, release it everywhere at the same time and then let the customers decide... that's competition, not biasing by doing exclusives...

I for my part will definetly not buy it during the exclusive phase, since I don't support that idea... Will I buy it somewhen? propably... but only as soon as its available unexclusive

btw: same goes to every store exclusive game (besides games that will ever only be exclusive, but those also at a very discounted price and not at launch)



excelite said:

Of course a developer/publisher is free to decide where to sell the software, but I think by doing exclusives you only harm yourself... people that hate/don't want a specific launcher (or simply to have everything in one place) will either wait it out and pay less money as soon as it's launched on the specific launcher they want (since i'ts an "old" game) or simply pirate it, play it and don't pay anything at all...

If you want to argue with more competition, release it everywhere at the same time and then let the customers decide... that's competition, not biasing by doing exclusives...

 

So funny that you blame the developer/publisher for this. You must be good with writing fake news.

The problem is that Steam doesn't want competition.

There are two rules to publish games on Steam:

1) You must match lowest price to every other stores.
2) Valve takes 30% tax.

Steam only have to remove one of these rules today and everyone might want to get back to Steam. Naturally this is not going to happen. No one expect them to change this within a year, so developers/publishers won't mind doing this 'exclusivity.'

The truth is, they call this 'Epic Stores exclusivity', because it's an euphenism for 'Steams anti-competitive practices.'

If you really want competition and free-market, then not buying on Steam -- unfortunately -- is the right way to go. At least until Steam change those rules.

For now, you just want to support anti-competitive behaviour. :D

 

 


Virgin
everythingisred said:

 

The problem is that Steam doesn't want competition.

There are two rules to publish games on Steam:

1) You must match lowest price to every other stores.
2) Valve takes 30% tax.

it's an euphenism for 'Steams anti-competitive practices.'

If you really want competition and free-market, then not buying on Steam -- unfortunately -- is the right way to go. At least until Steam change those rules.

For now, you just want to support anti-competitive behaviour. :D

 

 

First, price match parity is some that almost every other major digital stores across the US do. It's purpose is also to prevent publishers and developers to scam consumers, that raises price and applying it big sale, and making it look cheap. You love to get scammed at Summer sale? Blame the federal law, they also have similar kind of anti-consumer prevention measures and some regulations about price collusion.

Second, the 'tax' you say, the Steam fees for the developers are 20% for titles like Borderlands.

Epic is violating and shaking the whole digital competitive market with their big AXX fund from Chinese government. You want to compete Steam? You gotta do with better prices and better services, not devouring and destabilize the free market with big fund from foreign. Does Epic do either one of them, better prices or better services for consumers? I don't think so. People in Asia / SEA are currently blocked from using Epic store at all, and many of countries pay more, even much as twice than the Steam store price. What Epic want is monopolization through shady exclusivity deal behind the curtain. You call this 'competition'? You must be believe in Corporatocracy.

GoG is the fine example of healthy competition. And that's why everyone likes them. What Epic does is exact opposite direction that GoG chose to do. And that's why Epic is danger to free, competitive market and the threat to consumers.

You comment is beyond the old internet slang word, 'shilling'. You comment is just pure madness. 

edited